Thursday, April 15, 2010


Instead of integral color in concrete we are going to talk about mortar mix design for the April Newsletter. You can blame Jeff Datin of Concrete Artists Network. Jeff graciously let me be at his concrete carving class at the Concrete Décor Show in Phoenix and I met a great bunch of people who I would describe as free spirits. Am I right? Are carvers by nature free spirits, self taught, marching to their own drum? At the very least concrete carvers are pioneers and are taking the decorative concrete arts in new directions. They do some things with coloring and finishing that freak me out but new ideas incline back to the center as good inventions become tried and true. A true pioneer’s highest motivation is to give the customer good value and something unique. Anyway, several people have asked me about “scratch” mix designs. I hope this helps.

Reinforcement: As with concrete slab on grade so with the structural base for carving, whether on grade or a span, proper reinforcement is critical. The best information about reinforcement without getting a degree in civil engineering is available on a CD by Jeffrey Girard and Lane Mangum from the Concrete Countertop Institute. To order call them at 888-386-7711. You can trust their information completely. They are the real deal for straight stuff. A generalization should cover most situations. Whether you create a shape or basic structure for your project with EPS (expanded polystyrene), expanded metal lathe, paperback lathe, a wood structure, earth to be removed later, or other ingenious method, the reinforcing bar is required to be exterior to the contoured structure and fully embedded in the mortar or concrete. Do not put the steel behind the lathe, even if you can more or less embed it. Conventional concrete, from scratch mortar, sack concrete or packaged masonry mortar may be used to create the basic structure or “scratch” coat but the steel, whether #3, #4 or larger diameters must be embedded in the mortar. Spacing, 40 diameter laps or other engineered connectors will apply. Be sure to consider plan approvals, permitting and inspections.

Mix Designs and History: In the mortar design literature there are only two classes of mortar you should consider, Type S and Type M. Type S can yield 1800 psi and Type M 2500 psi. The difference is lime content and sand ratio. Do not confuse Type S mortar with Type S Lime. Either Type S or Type M mortar is adequate for your scratch coat in most cases.

A word about Type S lime: Up until about 1950, maybe 1955, masonry and plaster mortars were made using lime putties. Lime (CaO) was mixed in a pit with water to hydrate or slack the lime to get rid of the chemical heat of reaction and make it safer to use. This chemical reaction yields Ca(OH)2 as part of the lime or lime plus water so to speak. The bond is highly reactive as is the calcium oxide. The resulting product was delivered to the job as putty and dumped near the mixer. The hoddy cut a cubic foot with his shovel or measured in a box for accuracy. The quality of these mortars cannot be matched with modern bagged products. Type S lime is referred to as pre-slacked or slacked because the slacked lime or putty is dried and bagged. It is much “cooler” and safer to use but does not have the “slick” wonderful trowel properties of the old lime putty mortars. Look for the lime bag with the green print rather than the blue print. The cubic foot of putty dried is 2 cubic feet or one bag of lime. This is important because mortar designs are by volume. Treat all lime with respect. It can cause chemical burns.

To make a Type S mortar, mix 1 cubic foot or one 94 pound bag of Type I-II or I-IV Portland cement with ¼ bag Type S lime which is ½ cubic foot or 12.5 pounds. Add 360 pounds of washed masonry sand or about 24-30 #2 shovels. Use about 40 percent of the cement weight for mix water or 40 pounds which is approximately 1 and 1/3 five gallon pails. You will find the mortar fairly stiff but if you can apply it in a fairly uniform ¾ inch layer you can achieve 1800 psi. If you add the powders to the water it is easier to get a homogenous mix, same as cookin’ in the kitchen.

To make a Type M mortar, reduce the Type S lime content to 1/3 cubic foot or 1/6 of a bag of Type S lime, just 8.3 pounds. You will also reduce the water to 1 five gallon pail plus 2 quarts. Again, the mortar will be rather stiff but will yield a scratch coat harder than your head. Use the same amount of washed plaster or masonry sand. Notice that these modifications increase psi almost 40% to 2500 psi. That’s a lot. Usually there is not a lot of fuss over flexural strength which is a much more important structural quality, but psi is assumed to imply flexural strength for convenience and economics, a poor assumption.

Other Mix Designs: The two most common variations of these two mixes are using Plastic Cement and using bagged mortar. Plastic cement is common in the Southwest or other places where exterior plaster is a big industry. Plastic cement was developed as part of the history of asbestos in mortars because if lime could be reduced or eliminated while adding more sand and maintaining strength it saves money. Asbestos fibers were magic, enabling plaster to be pumped through plaster gun lines for several hundred feet. To maintain workability plastic cement has considerable air entrainment and plasticizing and usually contains large amounts of flyash to improve workability. If it works well for you, use it.

The other common product is bagged mortars. I hate them. Sand and lime have water loosely attached to them. When you mix Portland cement with sand, etc. as you must to bag a mortar, hydration begins because the cement has higher energy potential and will pull the water off the sand and lime. After three days of this slow hydration in the bag the mortar has lost its workability and a good deal of strength. Unless you are getting bagged mortars fresh from the bagger stay away from them. If you make your own mortars so you are used to good flow and trowel properties you won’t be able to stand bagged mortar.

Some Tricks for Strength, etc.: Workability or trowel properties are a huge issue for carving, kind of like overhead plastering. You need it to hang and stick. You have two choices with unmodified mixes, increase the lime and or decrease the sand. In general you don’t want to decrease the sand, it just gets too sticky and will be prone to shrinkage cracks. Increasing the lime can quickly reduce strength. (If you have trouble with shrinkage cracks you need more sand, less water or better sand meaning less clay contamination and fewer fines.)

The most effective alternative is to reduce the water. Decreasing water content by 30% can double the strength of mortar designs. The cheapest way to reduce water is to use either sodium lignin sulfonate or neutralized phenolic resin. These are low cost unsophisticated chemicals originating from stump pine tars in the South. They are the only high range water reducers that don’t turn your mix to heavy creeping syrup. Use ¾ ounce dry of either per sack of cement and you will probably reduce water for a given slump by up to 30%. Don’t use more than one ounce. You will have too much air and a serious drop in strength. You will be amazed at the strengths you can achieve. These products enable you to keep the lime ratios up for workability, reduce plastic shrinkage, use enough sand to avoid shrink cracks and still give you all the end product qualities you desire. The carboxylate polymers should be used if you have technical requirements.

In a past life I did custom masonry. I would tell the electricians, “You better get your boxes set before I cover you up.” They would tell me not to worry, that they would just cut them in. They only tried that once. When they could not cut the mortar joints they learned to get the boxes ready before I laid the brick.

Secondary or Supplemental Cementitious Content: The quickest way to get increased strengths is to use silica fume. Problem is silica fume is thirsty and tends to cut your open time to nothing. Better choices are VCAS and metakaolin. Both VCAS and metakaolin offer the additional benefit of reducing efflorescence. They accomplish this by consuming the excess Ca(OH)2 byproduct of hydration to form calcium silicate hydrate and calcium aluminate hydrate in the capillaries of the concrete matrix, thus densifying the concrete. The capillaries come from excess water in the concrete. Concrete and mortars typically require about 25% of the cement weight to fully hydrate. For workability and placement issues the amount used is usually around 40%. After secondary hydration the hydroxide radical is not available or able to leach to the surface, react with carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and form the insoluble carbonate stains you know as efflorescence. Both calcium silicate hydrate and calcium aluminate hydrate are stable components of hardened concrete and actually improve the long term stability by reducing swelling and other volume changes in concrete associated with shortening the long term life. A concrete specialist would say that secondary or supplemental cementitious materials are not needed if we correct the amount of water. Problem is we are using excess water for trowel and workability so we need at least some extra water.

VCAS and metakaolin are both aluminosilicates but VCAS comes from the glass industry and metakaolin comes from the clay industry. Both are fired at high temperatures in a combustion chamber to form amorphous or glass phase and then quenched to create their unique characteristics with respect to size and reactivity. If you read the literature you will find that both are presented as cement replacements up to 30%, sometimes more. For mortars I disagree. As a safe guideline I recommend using no more than 8% and not as a replacement but an add-on. In other words if you have 100 pounds of cement use up to 8 pounds of metakaolin or VCAS in addition to the 100 pounds. Don’t try to get more complex. To sum up, these products can increase your strengths to offset the reduction in strength from using more lime and also reduce efflorescence so your creation looks better over the life of the piece. In a word I think they are good for the end product for a long, long time.

To find a local source for VCAS call Vitro Minerals, 678-990-2658. For a local source of metakaolin call Powerpozz, 800-595-7552. I have found these people make a good effort to be helpful.

More tricks: One way to give increased fatness and some more workability to your mix is to add clay. This phenomenon is called false body. I recommend Amador 200 at a 2% dose or about 2 pounds Amador 200 per sack cement. I discourage fire clays. Fire clays work great but they are not good for color, acting like a wick to pull water from the atmosphere and give you rude surprises in color changes. Amador 200 is available at stucco manufacturers if you are located in California, Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico or Texas. If not, Amador 200 is usually available from a pottery or ceramic supplier.

Just a note on polymer additives: Generally they are a waste of money for scratch coats. If you use them avoid acetates (like Elmer’s Glue or anything that smells like it.) They blush if they get wet again. If you use them keep the dosage extremely low, about one cup, two at the most, per sack of cement, assuming about 30% solids. We make an acrylic additive we call Acrylic Activator for overlays, mortars, art work, logos, etc. It could be used as the mix water after blending 50/50 with water. I have used it before when I wanted a dramatic increase in flexural strength. Most cases it would waste your money.

Fibers: If you use fibers and there is any chance they will be exposed use only ¼ inch nylon. You will still get “hair” if you scrape the surface but they are easily burned off so you have a nice finish surface. Remember, we are talking scratch coat and base here. Keep the dose low. I would not use more than 100 grams or ¼ pound per cubic yard of mortar so that translates to about 18 grams per sack of cement. That is only 2/3 ounce, not much. Using the larger stiff fibers in a mortar can cause you problems trying to trowel into a mesh or stucco netting. The fibers sometimes form a grid you cannot easily push through the wire to get good embedment.

Using Color: Most carvers I have talked to don’t want color in the base. I think it is because they usually don’t know where they are going until they get there so they see color in the base as a limitation. If you learn to use small dosages of color you can save a lot of time coloring the finished shape. Try a ½ percent dose of red iron oxide in natural cement. You will find it knocks the green out of the cement and gives you a nice pallet to work on. If you need a light background to color try using a slag cement component up to 50%. It is a lot cheaper than white cement. Of course if you need a dark brown or black background you can dose up the color to about 4% of the cement weight. Increasing the dose beyond 4% won’t give much bang for your buck.

Don’t forget that Absolute Concrete Colors has dry pigments, mortar colors, acid stains, and other products for coloring, antiquing, cementitious paints, textures, sealers, releases and we can make a custom texture mat if you need one.

Summary: While there is a lot of monkey business you can do with mortars always start with the basics. If you are going to modify the basics don’t do everything at once. Add one thing. Then you can assess the difference. Then you can add something else if you want and assess that. It is easy to get too complex and just spend money and time. Get sophisticated if you want. Mortars are fun and interesting. Just keep the guidelines in mind and you will be okay.

Good concreting and have fun.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

Choosing Between Portland Cement Modifyers

The long term success or failure of modified Portland cement mortars depends on choosing the correct modifying product. For our purposes here we will discuss three classes of modifiers:
A. Acrylic cement modifiers
B. Polyvinyl acetate modifiers
C. Styrene butadiene modifiers
Other modifiers such as viscosity modifiers, flow modifiers, set-time modifiers, etc., will not be discussed here.

A. Acrylic modifiers: The acrylic resins and emulsions used in Portland cement mortar modification are from a chemical family called methyl esters of methacrylic acid. This family of acrylics is used to produce products from plexiglass to automotive finishes to concrete sealers to paint to dental repair materials to bone implant adhesion to mortar modification. The class we use for mortar modification is methyl methacrylate. You can tell by the smell. Acrylic emulsions smell like ammonia because ammonia is used to maintain the pH so the acrylic doesn't precipitate out like cottage cheese. If in doubt smell it.

The cool words don't matter but the chemistry does. In mortar modification it is a big deal that the acrylic version of the modifier (methyl methacrylate) in common use has both double carbon bonds and hydrogen to carbon bonds and a surplus of free hydrogen bondability. The carbon double bonds are incredibly strong. Think diamond. The carbon to hydrogen bonds are very short. Think about arm wrestling a guy with very short forearms. The excess or free hydrogen bonds will readily bond to anything else with an available electron particle. Think iron, aluminum and calcium, the metals that comprise the bulk of cement paste.


When water is added to Portland cement powder, complex reactions begin to change the blend of metallic oxides into a hard substance called a gel through a series of four main groups or phases of reactions. Each reaction produces byproducts that initiate the next reaction when the necessary energy threshold is reached. That is why you have initial set, a finisher set and 3, 7 and 28 day hardness. Tobermorite gel is the official name of the hard product that binds the aggregates to one another.

MAJOR COMPONENTS AND REACTIONS – WHY and HOW PORTLAND CEMENT WORKS

RAW MATERIALS, MINED, ASSAYED and ADJUSTED, FED INTO KILN AND BURNED TO FORM CLINKER to be GROUND

LIMESTONE = CaO + CaCO3 + DeltaE CO2
LIME Calcium Carbonate Heat Carbon Dioxide

CLAY = SiO2 + Al2O3 + Fe2O3 + Delta E + H2O
Silica Alumina Ferric Oxide Heat


CEMENT POWDER MIX WATER CONCRETE PRODUCTS and
BYPRODUCTS OF HYDRATION
2( 3CaO SiO2) + H2O = 3CaO SiO2 3H O + 3 Ca(OH)2
Tricalcium Silicate Water Tobermorite Gel Calcium hydroxide

2(2 CaO SiO2) + H2O = 3CaO SiO2 3H2 O + Ca(OH)2
Dicalcium Silicate Water Tobermorite Gel Calcium hydroxide

3 CaO Al2O3 + H2O + Ca(OH)2 = 3CaO Al2O3 Ca(OH)2 12H2O
Tricalcium Aluminate Water Calcium Hydroxide Tetracalcium Aluminate Hydrate

4CaO Al2O3 Fe2O3+H2O+2Ca(OH)2 = 6CaO Al2O3 Fe2O3 12H2O
Tetracalcium Aluminoferrite Water Calcium Hydroxide Calcium Aluminoferrite Hydrate

3CaO Al2O3 + CaSO4 2H2O + H2O = 3CaO Al2O3 CaSO4 12H2O
Tricalcium Aluminate Gypsum Water Calcium Monosulfoaluminate Hydrate



Acrylics for mortar modification were discovered in Germany in 1933 and have been in specialty use since the 1950's. German engineers developed special bridge spans that could deflect dramatically without failure in long spans. I have made 9 inch by 1 x 1 inch bars that I could deflect a full inch over time without failure. The primary contributions from acrylic additives are increased flexural strength which reduces cracking due to stress and improved bond strength. These benefits come about indirectly by holding onto the mix water so it is available for forming hydrogen bonds (hydration) instead of evaporating. In theory once this job is done the acrylic simply occupies space like an aggregate and is inert. In actual practice excess acrylic is used so there are additional considerations in the presence of solvents from sealers and cleaners which will soften the plastic film of excess acrylic. The bond strength is again an indirect result from the hydrogen bonds being able to form with the aggregates or other substrate prior to the water evaporating and not being available for forming bonds.

The technical writings you can find in the modified concrete literature usually say that acrylic modification does not increase compressive strengths. My tests show increased compressive strengths that, while not dramatic, are probably related to the principle of using low water concrete and a fog cure. See the test data I have included with this article. Much of the testing was done by Rohm and Haas, the dominant supplier until they were purchased by Dow Chemical who is now the dominant supplier.

The other benefit that makes acrylics superior as modifiers is that inert character. Once cured, the acrylic will not re-emulsify. In the presence of water and other chemicals common to concrete, acrylics will not "blush". That is a very good thing. I once maintained a 36 inch column of water on an acrylic modified mortar base 1/8 inch thick for three years. When the column was removed and the surface dried it was again completely serviceable, no effect on bond.

A note about powdered resins vs. aqueous or resin emulsions. It is, of course, more convenient to have everything available in a bag and just add water; however, you cannot get the same product by adding water. Here's why. In order to use a dry resin it must go into solution in a reasonable amount of time, say 5-15 minutes. A hard resin like the typical emulsions on the market will not do that. Additionally, the system has to be modified with other chemicals to get the acrylic to dissolve and the whole mix becomes too chemically sensitive. If you cannot get into solution timely you have production problems that are unacceptable. Acrylic resins once dry do not go back into solution easily. To cope with this reality a dry acrylic resin is a blend of at least two resins, one soft that will go into solution reasonably fast giving trowel or placement properties, and a hard or harder resin that will provide the end structural properties desired.

The theory is that the soft resin will go into solution quickly and give the modified properties desired for placement and finishing and the hard resin will go into solution before the product is fully set so the structural properties are achieved. Here's the problem: Solution time varies directly with temperature. A dry resin may perform well at 80F but not at all at 50F. Additionally, you have no dependable method to measure these factors. I used to get job failure calls on several manufacturers products every year when the weather started to change in Canada, spring and fall, but never a call from Southern California. I wonder why. These poor guys had called the manufacturers and were told they didn't follow instructions. I think the manufacturers probably didn't know their polymer would not perform at low temperatures.

B. Poly vinyl acetates are easily recognized by the smell, in emulsions at least. If you are working with a dry system you can sometimes smell it when wet but not always. If it smells like Elmer's Glue instead of ammonia it is poly vinyl acetate. Do not confuse acetates with polyvinyl alcohol. Polyvinyl alcohol is often a component of polyvinyl acetate to give it elongation and solubility features but is not used as a mortar modifier.

Poly vinyl acetates have a couple of advantages over acrylics but that doesn't mean you will want to use them.
1. They cost less. Acrylics achieve optimum performance at a dose of about 10% of the cement weight on a solids to solids basis. Often a 5% dose is plenty and you would rarely for any reason exceed 15% of the cement weight on a solids basis. That can be expensive. A poly vinyl acetate can probably give the same appearance of modification at less than one-third, maybe one-fifth those levels on a solids basis. For a lot of mortar that is a lot of money.

2. Poly vinyl acetate modified mortars have better workability and trowel properties. In technical terms that is things like fatness, flow and hang.
3. Initial structural properties are good to excellent. Cement hydration is well protected for the same reasons it is when using acrylics. Poly vinyl acetates mortars do not develop as good flexural properties as acrylics by a long shot but they yield excellent compressive strengths, they get very hard. Bond strengths are good to excellent but typically not as good as using acrylics. I think this is more of an index of hardness. Things that are brittle are more vulnerable to breaking bond, not because the bond is not good but because it is vulnerable to shock from the brittleness.

Poly vinyl acetate modified mortars have one glaring weakness. That is blush. When exposed to water or even high humidity they will soften and fail under stress. Even being sealed will not stop this problem if there is a high humidity environment for a prolonged period. Sealers will transmit water vapor at a rate of 4-5 pounds of water per 100 square feet. That is plenty of water to cause a problem if it goes on very long. In the Southwest US you will usually get away with it unless something goes wrong and as the plumber says in the movie Moonstruck, something always goes wrong. In the Northwest you will never get away with it. I was involved in the ICBO hearings for cementitious EIFS plaster substitutes and the stucco manufacturers got permission (along with other well financed concessions) to abandon acrylics in the mix design and not install vapor barrier behind the EPS board because, after all, it was Phoenix. That fall it rained 30 inches in Phoenix.

I am involved consulting on a job failure with a complicated terrazzo overlay labyrinth design. The zinc strips may have set up a cathodic (electrical) flow with the rebar in the slab causing the oxide of zinc to fracture the bond since zinc oxide takes up many times the volume of zinc. The overlay material is from a well known provider and trainer and their polymer is poly vinyl acetate and once the fracture allowed moisture to penetrate the overlay appears to have blushed, the bond failed, delamination began and is not repairable. A dollar catastrophe for sure but worse, a heartache, since it is a memorial to her dead son.

C. Styrene butadiene mortar modifiers work almost identically to acrylic mortar modifiers. They cost about the same, the dosage is about the same, the trowel properties and structural properties are about the same. The smell identification is much like acrylic with a “gas leak” odor. So you ask, “Why does it matter which I use.”

It matters a lot. Styrene butadienes will deteriorate in the presence of ultraviolet light. Some styrene butadienes are sold as styrene acrylics. That just means they will fail in the presence of UV light a little slower, but they will still fail. So where does styrene butadiene have a use. Underlayment. If you want to top it with an acrylic modified mortar it will perform equivalent to the acrylic. My opinion? Since there is little if anything to be gained over an acrylic modified mortar it only results in double inventory and risk of misuse. Stay with acrylics.

Conclusions? Unless you have a specific reason to use other modifiers stay with acrylics. They won’t let you down.

Good luck and good concreting.
The Doctor